Tuesday 19 June 2012
The Death of Qual?

Click on the Thumbnail to see the film.
Doubts about qualitative research in its traditional forms continue to gather pace. Here, in a cutely executed piece Coca Cola take a swipe at traditional processes – among them qualitative research. If you look more closely though, it is a particular form of qual that they criticise, namely “qualitative testing of scripts, an increasingly outmoded and irrelevant tool.”
Some colleagues have reacted nervously to this, perhaps wondering if it’s another brick in the growing wall of doubt about the usefulness and validity of our practices.
However, if you carry on, a few seconds later, you’ll hear enthusiastic avocation of a qualitative technique that can be used to ‘expand the creative potential’ in idea development. This turns out to be collaborative workshops with consumers, a qualitative experience if ever there was one, and is based in Coke’s idea that ‘consumers produce more brand stories than we (Coca Cola) do, so let’s move towards genuine consumer collaboration.’
This is co-creation if ever I heard it, and whether you carry it out online or via workshops is a choice. There are distinct advantages and drawbacks to both routes. In my recent paper, I define qualitative research as the study of subjective experience, it is not – and never has been in my view – a method for establishing likes and dislikes or eliciting opinions about material that consumers have no stake in. This kind of script testing work arose in the first place as big organisations back in the 80′s and 90′s established their own marketing departments and needed a handy tool to hold their ad agencies in check and provide fuel and ammunition for discussing agency recommendations with the consumer’s voice included. As I tell in the paper, this quickly became an industry standard practice and for many years many quallies lived off it, myself included. But we have found out since that it is of questionable validity and many of us have changed our methods.
We started co-creating in 1991 to resolve just this methodological issue. Glad to see Coca Cola catching up at last!
For what its worth, my own view of this film is that using a visualiser to tell a story is fine, but this story is far too processy, full of detail and jargon such that at the end the table of ‘tools’ being recommended looks overloaded and extremely crowded. I suspect its like that in real life as each of the techniques and their proponents struggle for supremacy.
Posted by roy at 12:17 pm. No comments
Read more about
abnorming
behavioural economics
brand research
brands
breakthrough
breakthrough psychology
case histories
co-creation
consumer psychology
consumer research
Courses
discovery
divergent thinking
facilitation
focus groups
Good Group
inequality
innovation
insight
large groups
letting go
linkedin
linked in
market research
moderating
New Series
opinion
organisational culture
politics
psychology
psychology on a page
qualitative research
rants
relational depth
Relationship Triangle
research techniques
roy langmaid
skills
society
tech
techniques
tools
topic guides
top tips
video Blog Archive (218)
Homepage Slider (22)
Opinion (8)
Videos (10)
WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck requires Flash Player 9 or better.
Register
Website Links
- Greg Rowland
- Hil Coaching
- http://britainthinks.com/
- Mac Andrews
- Mac Repairs London
- Mark Earls
- Nicky Forsythe at the Positive Therapy Co.
- Patrice van de Walle
- Steve Henry
- The Slog: John Ward's blog
- Tom Peck's Blog
- Wendy Gordon
- Wisdom from Johnnie Moore
- www.forsythe-associates.co.uk
- www.spring.org




Comments
Leave a comment