Saturday 16 April 2011
Why Organisations Lack Agility
An excellent description of one reason for lack of agility in organisations:
http://www.johnniemoore.com/blog/archives/002834.php
Here’s a quick version:
The boss says he’s coming over and asks some subordinate A to talk to him about X. A cancels a series of meetings to devote time to making an impressive powerpoint presentation about X.
In fact, A asks his near subordinates B, C and D to prepare some stuff for him on the subject.
B, C and D then basically replicate A’s behaviour, cancelling their own meetings and interfering with the lives of E/F/G, H/I/J and K/L/M.
Depending on the size of the organisation, rinse and repeat through various layers.
Posted by roy at 6:37 am. 2 comments
Read more about
abnorming
behavioural economics
brand research
brands
breakthrough
breakthrough psychology
case histories
co-creation
consumer psychology
consumer research
Courses
discovery
divergent thinking
facilitation
focus groups
Good Group
inequality
innovation
insight
large groups
letting go
linkedin
linked in
market research
moderating
New Series
opinion
organisational culture
politics
psychology
psychology on a page
qualitative research
rants
relational depth
Relationship Triangle
research techniques
roy langmaid
skills
society
tech
techniques
tools
topic guides
top tips
video Blog Archive (218)
Homepage Slider (22)
Opinion (8)
Videos (10)
WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck requires Flash Player 9 or better.
Register
Website Links
- Greg Rowland
- Hil Coaching
- http://britainthinks.com/
- Mac Andrews
- Mac Repairs London
- Mark Earls
- Nicky Forsythe at the Positive Therapy Co.
- Patrice van de Walle
- Steve Henry
- The Slog: John Ward's blog
- Tom Peck's Blog
- Wendy Gordon
- Wisdom from Johnnie Moore
- www.forsythe-associates.co.uk
- www.spring.org




Comments
yes it’s true – but the rigidity, or burocracy or whatever you want to call it, becomes necessary once the company reaches a certain size. Otherwise there it will be impossible to control, who is doing what, and the amount of “double up” will surely cost the company much more?
Comment by Boris — Monday 18 April 2011 at 8:57 pm
Boris, of course structure is important – and large groups quickly become chaotic or paralysed without some. But at British Airways it was often that people said to us, “They’re doing this project in two other parts of the airline that I know of!” The thing about structure is that it tends to breed replication – something that seems a good idea in Dept X, must be cool for Depts Y and Z. Just like fashion or music, structure is infectious and spreads.
Most of the big organisations I have worked for have too much structure and everyone who works there knows it. The secondary gain for the workforce is that once you know the structure you can find your way around it – or blame it for your problems!
Comment by roy — Monday 18 April 2011 at 9:03 pm
Leave a comment